Thoughts on the Last Fight in Gaza

For an outsider looking at what is happening in the Middle East it is easy to take an aloof view point and say: “Why can’t you guys just stop fighting with each other?”  It is easy to judge both sides as being similar.  However, this is not the case.  Israel is a democratic republic.  It has free elections.  It has freedom of speech to a degree surpassing even the United Stated.  It is a highly developed, and economically stable country.

Because it is a democracy, Israel does not always have the best government. It has known good Prime Ministers and bad ones.  However, the Israeli government has to operate within the boundary of the law.  Israel has a pretty good Supreme Court, and anybody can take his grievances to it.

Israelis put a lot of importance on protecting civilians.  The israeli army (IDF) would not dream of placing a munition store in a densely populated area.  They do feel that their job is to protect the population and not hide behind it.

While Israel is a Jewish State.  It operate on secular law.  In fact, the jewish religious law takes an ever decreasing part in the conduct of the government and all its branches.

In comparison, let us look at the Hamas government. Once the Hamas took power in Gaza in a democratic election, they were never willing to take the risk of having another election.  Democracy? I do not think so.  As for rule of law, the only laws enforced in Gaza are the Sharia (Islamic) laws as interpreted by Hamas leaders.  These laws are only applied to the population at large not to the Hamas leaders themselves.

The Hamas government is funded and supported by Iran.  A country that is not at all interested in protecting the palestinian people.  Thus, Hamas is not concerned at all with the protection of its people.  On the contrary, they hide behind the population.  They place munitions under hospitals.  The launch rockets from school yards.  Then they cynically use civilian casualties real and imaginary in their propaganda.

Economically, Gaza is fully dependent on Israel, Egypt, and Iran.  Even while the latest fighting was going on, Israel kept the electricity going to Gaza.  This while the Hamas was shelling these same lines.  I implore all the readers to stop thinking about Hamas in the same way they think about their own government.  Hamas is not a government.  It is not “by the people and for the people.”  It does not “serve and protect.”

Let us now look at the latest confrontation.  For four years the Hamas has been rocketing Israeli cities.  Their fight is a fight of cowards. They do not fight the Israeli army. They fight innocent civilians.  To the word they talk about some right that they supposedly have to the land of Israel.  They keep repeating historically outrageous lies.  I urge the readers to not buy into these lies.  The land of Israel was never theirs.  The big Arab migration to “Palestine” came after the Israeli settlement started not before.  In 1948 when they fled the country, most of the land was uninhabited.  They cannot take credit for any of the achievements of Israel.

I want to make it clear that the last paragraph does not apply to those Arabs and other minorities who stayed in Israel.  I consider them equal partners in the development of the Country.

But let us be really blunt here.  Even if the Palestinian grievances where justified.  Does that give them moral permission to attack civilian population?  If your answer is “yes”, I urge you to consider what your response would have been if missiles landed in your city, or in your back yard.  If you were afraid to send your child to school because of missiles coming over the border.  If your answer to that would be that you still justify that kind of aggression, you are simply being dishonest.

So, like I mentioned before, for four years an aggression against civilian population.  What was the “right winged” Netanyahu government doing about it? In a word, nothing.  Two months before the election Netanyahu woke up and started a military campaign against Gaza. He received an unprecedented support from the people.  Even the left winged supported him.  Even President Shimon Peres, a known piece activist supported him.  Unusually, even the European Union supported him.  Everybody believed that he will now deal a deadly blow to the Hamas, toppling its government and placing a more moderate government in Gaza.  However, that did not happen Netanyahu, who is not a decisive person, yielded to a mild pressure exerted by the US and declared a pre-mature cease fire.  To the people of Israel he told that Hamas was bitten.  Yet, for three hours after the cease fire was in effect Hamas continue to launch rockets at Israel.  If they are so destroyed, how come they can launch so many rockets.

I believe that Netanyahu and by association Obama made several grave mistakes in their treatment of the issue.  A mistake that not only hurts the interest of Israel, but also the interest of the United States.

  1. By dealing with Hamas before their military might was visibly destroyed they gave Hams (and its protector Iran) a great political win.  Even if the Israeli government is correct, and Hamas resources were destroyed, this win will encourage them to continue the route of violence.
  2. By giving in to Hamas’ requests regarding and easing the blockade (something Israel should have done on its own four years ago), Israel and the US gave Hamas (and the Palestinian Authority) a clear message: “If you persist with terrorism, you will win.”  This not only hurts Israel, it also hurts the moderate Palestinians.
  3. Egypt has become openly hostile to Israel and covertly hostile to the United States.  Its Prime Minister is taking dictatorial measures.  Israel and the US should have not agreed to hold the talks in Cairo under the auspices of the Egyptian Prime Minister.  There are enough moderate Arab Countries who would have loved to hold the talks.
  4. Throughout the fighting Israel and the US neglected to mention that the situation in Syria is much more dire.  The Syrian President is murdering his own people.  He welcomed the respite where everybody was blaming Israel.  Israel neglected to direct the blame back to him.

One might ask: “So what do we do now?  Do we renew the fighting?”  The answer is no it is too late for that.  This is what must happen now:

  • The Israeli people should not vote for Netanyahu he does not care about the majority of Israeli people.  He did not act to solve the problems faced by the Israeli population.
  • Israel and the United States should encourage the Palestinian Authority.  They have been non violent for a while and they have been concentrating on their own country.  This behavior should be promoted.
  • Israel should make it very clear that even one missile launched at its population will constitute a declaration of war and the Israeli Army will response with a decisive blow to the Hamas government.  It is the United States best interest to publicly support that.
  • Israel should clearly tell the European Community: “We are here.  We are not going away.  We will protect ourselves and our existence at all cost.  If you have a disagreement with that look at your own history.”  It should be made very clear (and demonstrated by dealing with the Palestinian Authority) that we are willing to negotiate for a peaceful solution, but not under the gun.
  • Israel and the United States should work with the moderate Arab Countries toward a resolution in Syria.  Israel shares a long border with Syria.  Syria creates a connection between Iran and Hezbollah.  We can no longer be deaf to the cries of the Syrian people.  We must act.

2 thoughts on “Thoughts on the Last Fight in Gaza

  1. Alex Scarpati

    Thank you for your clear comunication of the sanest point of view mI have heard so far . Can I ask you to take a look at a BBC documentary and please tell me if it is 100% accurate and if not what are the specific inaccuracies and what is the correct data?
    here is the link :

    1. aharonfr Post author

      Thank you for you kine comment. The BBC in general is very anti Israeli and tends to skew the facts to support that view point. I will view this link and get back on that, either as a post or as a comment.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s